During the month of June, feel free to comment and/or discuss any of the "blog-within-a-blog" topics that have been posted (right-hand column).
David E. Fitch: The Church of Us vs. Them: Freedom from a Faith That Feeds on Making Enemies
Winfield Bevins: Ever Ancient, Ever New: The Allure of Liturgy for a New Generation
Glenn Packiam: Blessed Broken Given: How Your Story Becomes Sacred in the Hands of Jesus
Sandra Maria Van Opstal: The Next Worship: Glorifying God in a Diverse World
Colleen Carroll: The New Faithful: Why Young Adults Are Embracing Christian Orthodoxy
« Rick Warren's Salvation Video | Main | 'In Christ' or 'Christ in You'? »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Regarding: Chaplain Faces Court Martial I have to say that this isn't the pciture of the oppression on christians that many will paint it to be. As a former member of the armed forces, I am aware, and so are all members of the armed forces, that not all right afforded to U.S. Citizens are afforded to members of its military. Many rights are voluntarily waived when you enter the military. Why? Because extreme discipline is needed to save lives.
Now I won't get into why Jesus name is not allowed in public prayer, although I suspect the story is misleading and no specific god's name is allowed at all, because the court martial is made the issue here, so I will address it.
The Naval Secretary ordered something. A Naval Officer refused to comply. He is facing trial.
Now if you look at the base points of this case, is this so outrageous? Would you be so quick to post out here this incredible story if the crime had been speaking to the press about some innoccuous on-base picnic? Or any other violation of regulations and of the oath he took as an officer in the Navy?
Posted by: Wanderer | June 04, 2006 at 01:23 PM
Wanderer, my interest in this story is more connected to issues of freedom of religion, free speech, and justifiable civil disobedience (or similar disobedience for conscious sake). The military is not the only institution with bans in place regarding the use of "in Jesus' name" -- many local governments (i.e. cities, counties) disallow the use of "in Jesus' name" in conjunction with invocation prayers offered up at the beginning of official meetings.
In our out-of-control, egalitarian culture, I find this particular protest very interesting.
Posted by: Chris | June 07, 2006 at 01:13 PM
Unfortunately, as I said, the joining of the military voluntarily suspends such rights to protest. This context is extremely important to the story. If many other such stories exist, it would seem to help you more to post them instead of this one. Just my thought.
Posted by: Wanderer | June 07, 2006 at 07:30 PM