"Isn't that... Catholic?"
August 28, 2008
The task of leading change is often challenging, if not down-right difficult for pastors and church leaders. Usually, the faster the changes and/or the more significant they are, the greater the resistance and difficulty. If, however changes are effected too slowly, renewal and renovation may never occur.
Leaders who are committed to leading the Evangelical church in the discovery and reclamation of our ancient-future faith, commonly encounter challenges and difficulties unique to those pioneering change. An example of this would be how frequently ancient Christian practices are quickly and thoughtlessly labeled as "Catholic" (i.e. Roman Catholic), as if anything that smacks of being ancient, mystical, contemplative, or involving ritual, repetition, or symbol is automatically Catholic.
And so... I often find myself in conversations with people who, when such topics or practices come up, end up saying the exact same thing: "Isn't that... Catholic?"
What I find myself thinking about -- and it's something many of you can help me with -- is what would a list of wrongly "Catholicized" non-Catholic (or not-exclusively-Catholic) practices look like?
I'll start a tentative list below, and then invite you to add, edit, and/or comment.
Non/Not-Necessarily Catholic:
- recitation of ancient creeds
- following the Christian Year/calendar
- teaching or reading from the Lectionary
- Communion with common loaf & cup
- Using the word, "Eucharist"
- Wearing of a clerical collar
- praying common prayers together
- display of icons
- use of liturgical colors
- singing the psalms or certain prayers
- standing for the reading of the Gospel
- observing Ash Wednesday, Maundy Thursday, etc.
.
.
Photo credit: © iStockphoto.com/Hande Yüce